Within the context of the EU Directive 2019/1023/UE of 20 June 2019 (“Directive”) and within the aftermath of the Covid disaster, France has reformed its insolvency laws. The aim of the laws is each to implement the necessities of the Directive into the French laws, but in addition to sort out the results of the Covid disaster and endorse a few of the measures which were taken on this respect and have introduced the variety of insolvency proceedings to a historic low, in addition to different measures.
To take action, France has very not too long ago revealed numerous items of laws to implement the required adjustments. Specifically, France has adopted a primary set of laws aiming at implementing measures to help firms in surpassing the financial results of the sanitary disaster (Legislation n°2021-689 du 31 Could 2021 on the exit of the sanitary disaster and Decrees n°2021-1354 and n°2021-1355 du 16 October 2021 on the process relevant). It has additionally adopted a second set of laws – Order n°2021-1193 of 15 September 2021 and Decree n°2021-1218 of 23 September 2021 – which amended E book VI of the French Industrial Code regarding Insolvency.
The general objective of the reform is (i) to bolster the effectivity and pace of insolvency proceedings, by bettering the instruments accessible to detect the difficulties of firms at an early stage and supply immediate restructuring options to take care of the exercise of the businesses involved by preventive measures, (ii) to simplify the procedures relevant and (iii) to make sure a correct stability of the rights of all involved events by reinforcing the powers of “ events” (i.e. collectors, but in addition shareholders).
The reform is dense, however the primary options are briefly offered under.
Reinforcement of early preventive measures
The French laws already contained numerous measures on this respect. The reform has improved and expanded the prevailing instruments on the early detection of difficulties.
To take action it has (i) accelerated the alert mechanism, specifically by an elevated function of exterior auditors who can inform the President of the Industrial Courtroom, (ii) elevated the powers of the President of the Industrial Courtroom as an example by permitting them to undertake an investigation with out having to attend for an audition of the Director of the corporate involved.
The reform additionally bolstered and clarified the provisions relevant through the “conciliation” proceedings, a pre-existing confidential pre-insolvency measure. It contains measures aiming at suspending cost of receivables through the conciliation section and preserving securities granted throughout that interval to collectors in case of subsequent insolvency and/or failure of the conciliation measures.
To attain larger transparency relating to the prices of the conciliation, debtors should now file (with the help of their conciliator) an announcement of all conciliation-related prices, in addition to all prices associated to the intervention of an advert hoc administrator (together with administrator/conciliator prices, but in addition legal professionals, monetary specialists and so on.). To strengthen the confidentiality of conciliation, third events will solely have the ability to get hold of the conciliation settlement ought to their opposition be declared admissible.
Reinforcement and acceleration of safeguard proceedings
The measures regarding safeguard proceedings (one of many three accessible insolvency proceedings beneath French regulation, along with administration and liquidation proceedings) purpose at growing the effectivity and pace of those proceedings, the aim of which is to help within the restructuring of firms that aren’t but bancrupt, however face critical monetary difficulties.
On this respect, the reform has improved the “customary” safeguard proceedings and enforced the next measures:
The length of the remark interval (a interval that instantly follows the opening of insolvency proceedings and on the finish of which the state of affairs of the corporate is reassessed) is decreased from 18 to 12 months most (i.e. a 6 months interval that may be prolonged as soon as by one other 6 months), with any extension restricted to a “specifically reasoned” request;
Introduction of the opportunity of establishing the checklist of receivables primarily based on statements of the accountants of the corporate’s exterior auditors;
Funds beneath the restructuring plan that’s adopted shall be topic to an annual minimal cost of 10% of the whole claims from the sixth 12 months of the plan;
Any courses/classes of “affected events” constituted through the safeguard proceedings are maintained in case the continuing is transformed into administration proceedings;
Introduction of a type of safeguard “privilege” (additionally relevant for administration proceedings), whereby any creditor that introduces “new cash” will profit from additional safety that may be paid in precedence to different receivables (after wage receivables);
Introduction of the rule that “silence equals acceptance” from collectors the place there’s a substantial modification of the restructuring plan (excluding circumstances the place courses/committees of “ events” are constituted and should be consulted);
The reforms additionally extends the scope of accelerated safeguard proceedings pursuant to the Directive. Whereas it maintains a few of the Covid associated measures (removing of thresholds, chance of limitation to monetary collectors, prior conciliation required; strong plan required), it additionally added new options. Specifically, the length of the proceedings has been decreased to 2 months (extendable as much as 4 months most); firms resorting to this process are obliged to create courses/committees of “ events” no matter their measurement. It’s price noting that any failure to undertake the plan within the required timeframe will outcome within the termination of the proceedings (no conversion into administration proceedings is feasible). Nevertheless, the businesses involved can at all times file a brand new software for administration proceedings ought to it really grow to be bancrupt.
The introduction of courses of “affected events”: a reinforcement of the rights of collectors and shareholders
That is once more a provision stemming from the Directive. The reform has eliminated the prevailing committees of collectors to create “courses of affected events”, thus creating a whole new part within the French Industrial Code on this respect (Title II, Chapter VI, Part 3 of the French Industrial Code). The target is that extra affected events are concerned within the early levels of the restructuring plan, making certain they’ve a say and protect their rights. Whereas one of many goals of the Directive was to harmonise the laws all through Europe, the French legislator has not gone so far as some frequent regulation nations or Germany within the affect granted to collectors on the proceedings. France has maintained a stability between the rights of the businesses dealing with the difficulties and people of collectors.
In accelerated safeguard proceedings and, for different proceedings, to firms with 250 workers and over 20 million euros of turnover (or over 40 million euros of turnover) it’s obligatory for there to be courses of “affected events”. Firms beneath that threshold can voluntarily represent courses, though this seems unlikely.
“Affected events” are outlined as events prone to be impacted by the restructuring plan. This embody collectors (as was the case earlier than). Additionally they embody shareholders, which is a novelty beneath French regulation.
The administrator decides the structure of the courses primarily based on the character of the receivables and goal standards (outlined by the brand new industrial code as an “financial curiosity group”). As least two courses should be constituted and should embody affected events with safety on the belongings. All worker associated receivables are excluded from this new system.
As soon as constituted the courses can then vote on the proposed restructuring plan (at a 2/3 majority of these voting). Solely in administration proceedings can competing restructuring plans be proposed by collectors.
The Tribunal then endorses the plan as voted by the courses after verifying that the very best pursuits of all events are revered.
If sure affected events have voted in opposition to the plan, the court docket should now examine whether or not they get hold of a cost that might be at the very least equal to what they’d be entitled to if the corporate went into liquidation, there was an task of the enterprise as a going concern (i.e. the sale of the enterprise of the bancrupt firm) or the “greatest different answer”. Because of this Tribunal will now must assess the state of affairs of every collectors that voted in opposition to the plan.
If sure courses of affected events have voted in opposition to the plan, the Tribunal could have the ability to impose the plan if at the very least one class has voted in favour of the plan, making use of absolutely the precedence rule (i.e. checking if collectors of upper rank shall be absolutely paid earlier than every other creditor can obtain cost).
Different related provisions
The reform has additionally launched new guidelines for holders of securities and guarantors, some merely endorsing measures enacted as a response to the Covid disaster. These new measures embody (i) the opportunity of granting typical securities on the belongings of the debtor, (ii) the opportunity of disposing of sure belongings not essential for the conventional operation of the corporate, (iii) the opportunity of paying transporters after the opening of insolvency proceedings, (iv) the opportunity of acquiring a greater place for any injection of “new cash” (as 2nd rating safety holder after worker claims).
The order and decree additionally introduce an obligation on holders of securities and guarantors to declare their receivables.
Lastly, the reform incorporates a sure variety of provisions on the “second probability” given to administrators of the bancrupt firm. Solely administrators which have acted outdoors of their duties could also be sanctioned (prohibition to behave as director of an organization, monetary sanctions). Others, could have one other alternative to restart or proceed enterprise whereas not being held accountable for the insolvency, even when a few of their selections, within the regular course of enterprise, have triggered their chapter.
This reform entered into drive on 1 October 2021, however will not be relevant to insolvency proceedings already pending at that time.
Whereas this reform incorporates quite a lot of new measures, it’s prone to solely have an effect on a restricted variety of firms given the thresholds imposed. However, it preserves the prevailing relevant process however re-balances the powers and rights of all concerned or “affected” events.
© Copyright 2021 Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLPNationwide Legislation Evaluation, Quantity XI, Quantity 328