Kangana Ranaut’s lawyer intends to problem rejection of plea to switch defamation case filed by Javed Akhtar in opposition to the actress to a different courtroom. The listening to has been adjourned until December 13.
Kangana Ranaut has sought switch of the defamation case filed by Javed Akhtar in opposition to her to a different courtroom.
Whereas Kangana Ranaut and lyricist Javed Akhtar, each remained absent within the listening to of the defamation grievance filed by the latter, the previous advised the courtroom by her lawyer that she might be submitting an attraction in opposition to the Chief Metropolitan Justice of the Peace (CMM) order handed in opposition to her just lately. The attraction is prone to be filed quickly within the Mumbai periods courtroom.
The Andheri Justice of the Peace Court docket had scheduled Javed Akhtar’s grievance for listening to after greater than two months as over the past listening to on September 20, Kangana had advised the courtroom that she had no religion in it. Even her personal grievance which she had filed in opposition to Akhtar just lately got here up for listening to earlier than the identical courtroom on Monday.
Advocate Rizwan Siddiquee showing for Kangana advised the courtroom that his plea in search of switch of case from the Andheri Justice of the Peace courtroom to another courtroom was rejected by the CMM and he intends to problem it in Mumbai periods courtroom.
Siddiquee additionally filed one other software in search of exemption from private look. Advocate Jay Bharadwaj showing for Akhtar opposed the applying. Nevertheless Justice of the Peace RR Khan allowed the applying “within the curiosity of justice” and adjourned the listening to of each the functions to December 13. In case no order for switch is handed by the 12 months finish in favour of Ranaut, the actress should seem earlier than the Justice of the Peace on the following date of listening to. The Justice of the Peace has stored the case “for additional continuing and for look of accused (Ranaut) and for framing of cost in opposition to the accused.”
Siddiquee had contended that Ranaut was being summoned to Andheri Court docket by Justice of the Peace Khan with out specifying any causes as to why she was anticipated to look. “I’m making a categorical assertion, I’ve misplaced religion on this Court docket,” Siddiquee had said. “With out giving causes in a bailable, compoundable , non-cognizable offence, the courtroom has been issuing threats to her that arrest warrants might be issued,” Siddiquee had mentioned. He had raised these points earlier than the CMM.
Javed Akhtar had filed the defamation grievance in opposition to Kangana Ranaut final 12 months the place he said that he had been defamed by her in a televised interview. Ranaut however filed a counter grievance in opposition to Akhtar whereas accusing him of extortion.
Click on right here for IndiaToday.in’s complete coverage of the coronavirus pandemic.