Within the US, social media corporations are shielded from legal responsibility for his or her content material by s230 of the Communications Decency Act. In her testimony, Ms Haugen mentioned that, whereas enhancements to privateness legal guidelines and amendments to the CDA would assist, they weren’t an entire reply to the harm completed by social media corporations.
“Fb desires to trick you into considering that privateness protections or modifications to Part 230 alone can be enough,” she testified.
“Whereas necessary, these is not going to get to the core of the difficulty, which is that nobody really understands the harmful selections made by Fb besides Fb.
“We will afford nothing lower than full transparency,” Ms Haugen mentioned.
Fb Australia’s director of public coverage, Mia Garlick, mentioned in an announcement that the corporate supported the event of worldwide codes round younger folks’s knowledge.
“We’ve been actively calling for privateness regulation and perceive the significance of making certain Australia’s privateness legal guidelines evolve at a comparable tempo to the speed of innovation and new know-how we’re experiencing at this time.
“We’re reviewing the draft invoice and dialogue paper launched at this time, and sit up for working with the Australian authorities on this additional,” she mentioned.
Senator Money mentioned the brand new privateness legal guidelines would guarantee Australians’ privateness could be handled extra fastidiously and transparently by on-line platforms.
She promised heavy punishment for social media corporations that “don’t meet that customary”.