China’s Twitter-like Sina Weibo (WB.O) mentioned on Friday it could take down a web-based listing that ranks celebrities by recognition after state media mentioned social media platforms must rein within the promotion of superstar tradition to guard kids.
The announcement got here hours after the state-owned Folks’s Day by day printed an editorial criticising platforms that prioritize visitors and create celebrities out of “unworthy” people, who can draw consideration and cash from followers.
It didn’t identify any corporations.
Weibo mentioned its choice to take down the “star energy listing”, which ranked celebrities based mostly on the recognition of their social posts and variety of followers, was partly because of the “irrational help” some followers have been displaying for celebrities.
“The listing can not comprehensively and objectively replicate the social affect of stars” and discourages wholesome interplay between stars and followers, the corporate mentioned within the assertion.
The listing was now not seen on line on Friday.
The Folks’s Day by day opinion piece is considered one of a number of editorials printed this week calling for crackdowns on industries comparable to gaming and alcohol, which have prompted traders to dump shares in focused sectors.
The article argued that youngsters’ cultural expertise, self-awareness and consumption habits have been all influenced by new media and know-how, whereas the kind of celebrities they adopted and admired have been carefully associated to on-line platforms.
The editorial comes after Chinese language-Canadian pop singer Kris Wu was detained by police amid allegations of seducing underage ladies. Wu has denied the accusations.
Wu’s case has been extensively adopted in China and seen as an indication of excesses in China’s leisure business and well timed within the wake of the worldwide #MeToo motion.
On-line platforms ought to “strictly management idol improvement programmes and strengthen administration of expertise present programmes” by controlling critiques, voting mechanisms and feedback, the article mentioned.