A decide referred to as the girl’s actions “vile and disgusting,” however decided he couldn’t apply the state’s hate crime enhancement to provide her a harsher sentence. “If the legislature needed to incorporate petty misdemeanors within the sentencing-enhancement statute, it might have finished so,” District Court docket Choose James J. Caruolo mentioned in June.
Neronha mentioned he respects Caruolo however disagrees along with his studying of the state Hate Crimes Sentencing Act. “The decide concluded that that’s a petty misdemeanor and so due to this fact it’s not included inside the definition of crime,” he mentioned. “I view disorderly conduct as a criminal offense.”
However “affordable minds might differ,” Neronha mentioned, so he needs to make clear the regulation by, for instance, spelling out whether or not it applies to petty misdemeanors.
Choose Caruolo additionally questioned why the lawyer basic’s workplace didn’t cost the girl with assault, saying she may need acquired a stiffer sentence if she had confronted that cost.
However Neronha rejected the concept that his workplace made a mistake. “It’s fairly clear it’s not an assault,” he mentioned. “Once more, with respect to Choose Caruolo, I’m unsure what he was considering there.” He mentioned disorderly conduct was the best cost and that “mere phrases with out assaultive conduct” is unlikely to end in an assault conviction.
Neronha’s workplace couldn’t persuade one other decide to use the hate crime enhancement regulation to the case of a Barrington man who was discovered responsible of disorderly conduct and assault for yelling racial slurs in a dispute along with his Muslim neighbors.
District Court docket Choose Stephen M. Isherwood mentioned that whereas he discovered the racial slurs “nothing less than repulsive,” he wasn’t satisfied that the hate crime sentencing regulation ought to apply.
Neronha disagreed with that call, saying that whereas the incident concerned a border dispute, the enhancement ought to apply in “blended motive circumstances” so long as a part of the motivation was pushed by hate. “So, once more, we’re making an attempt to make clear that,” he mentioned. “I believe we’re proper on that challenge.”
On the lawyer basic’s request, Consultant Mary Ann Shallcross Smith, a Lincoln Democrat, introduced a bill to revamp the Hate Crimes Sentencing Act. However the Home Judiciary Committee held it for additional examine, and the legislative session is predicted to finish Thursday.
Neronha mentioned that earlier than he took workplace, the hate crime enhancement regulation had not been used for years. “We determined to make use of it as a result of we thought the precept was necessary,” he mentioned. “Put your self within the footwear of a household that allegedly can’t have a meal just because they’re focused due to the colour of their pores and skin … That conduct is simply not tolerable.”
Hear extra by downloading the newest episode of Rhode Island Report, accessible on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Amazon Music, iHeartRadio, Google Podcasts, and different podcasting platforms, or pay attention within the participant under: